[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtxLoPOykLDTzTn9@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 20:27:28 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mike Yang <reimu@...omaker.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>,
tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com, p.yadav@...com, michael@...le.cc,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, aidanmacdonald.0x0@...il.com,
tmn505@...il.com, paul@...pouillou.net, dongsheng.qiu@...enic.com,
aric.pzqi@...enic.com, rick.tyliu@...enic.com,
jinghui.liu@...enic.com, sernia.zhou@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: SPI: Add Ingenic SFC bindings.
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 02:47:14AM +0800, Mike Yang wrote:
> On 7/24/22 01:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 23/07/2022 18:50, Zhou Yanjie wrote:
> >> No offense, does it really need to be named that way?
> >> I can't seem to find documentation with instructions on this :(
...
> > All bindings are to follow this rule, so I don't understand why you
> > think it is an exception for you?
> Zhou didn't ask you to make an exception. They have a valid
> point and they're asking why.
> You may want to avoid further incidents of this kind by stop
> being bossy and actually writing a guideline of naming these
> .yaml files and publish it somewhere online.
Yeah, I do have to say that I was also completely unaware that
there was any enforced convention here.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists