[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220723192211.GP25951@gate.crashing.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 14:22:11 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>, lkp@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...il.com,
Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr, paulus@...ba.org, joel@....id.au,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, hbathini@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Remove the static variable initialisations to 0
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 03:34:05PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 05:24:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Initialise global and static variable to 0 is always unnecessary.
> > Remove the unnecessary initialisations.
>
> Isn't this change also unnecessary?
>
> Initializing to 0 does not affect correctness, or even any kind of
> semantics in any way.
It did make a difference when the kernel was still compiled with
-fcommon (which used to be the GCC default on most configurations, it is
traditional on Unix). No explicit initialiser puts an object in .bss if
you use -fcommon. This matters a bit for data layout.
> The current code is slightly easier to understand.
>
> And changing the code introduces history noise for na gain.
Yup.
This does give you some code golf points of course ;-)
Segher
Powered by blists - more mailing lists