[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d684ed27-2530-4470-a320-80baadbb6197@sholland.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:24:40 -0500
From: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc: heiko@...ech.de, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] riscv: Add macro for multiple nop instructions
Hi Palmer,
On 7/21/22 9:16 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2022 07:30:57 PDT (-0700), heiko@...ech.de wrote:
>> Some cases need multiple nop instructions and arm64 already has a
>> nice helper for not needing to write all of them out but instead
>> use a helper to add n nops.
>>
>> So add a similar thing to riscv and convert the T-Head PMA
>> alternative to use it.
>>
>>
>> Heiko Stuebner (2):
>> riscv: introduce nops and __nops macros for NOP sequences
>> riscv: convert the t-head pbmt errata to use the __nops macro
>>
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 ++
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h | 8 +-------
>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks, these are on for-next. I had to fix up some minor conflicts, but
> hopefuly nothing went wrong.
The conflicts are because the patch was sent on top of fixes, specifically
e83031564137 ("riscv: Fix ALT_THEAD_PMA's asm parameters"). Since you applied
this patch without pulling fixes in to for-next, now for-next conflicts with master.
Regards,
Samuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists