[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f4c233f8f6f9288b17859efab0cb22df2452777.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 23:54:51 +0200
From: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>, bvanassche@....org,
stanley.chu@...iatek.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com, quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com,
quic_ziqichen@...cinc.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
Jinyoung Choi <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add Multi-Circular Queue support
Hi Can/Asutosh
A few questions about MCQ configuration:
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 00:01 -0700, Can Guo wrote:
> From: Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>
>
> Adds MCQ support to UFS driver.
>
> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
> ---
>
> +void ufshcd_mcq_config_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> + u32 val = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_MCQ_CFG);
> +
> + val &= ~MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK;
> + val |= hba->dev_info.bqueuedepth << MCQ_CFG_MAC_OFFSET;
> + ufshcd_writel(hba, val, REG_UFS_MCQ_CFG);
Here you set MaxActiveCommand to dev_info.bqueuedepth (this limit comes
from UFS devices). I see in the qsize configuration that you want to
set the queue depth in each HW queue to be hba->nutrs (this limit comes
from UFSHCI), should not it be min(device limit, ufshci limit)?
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_mcq_config_mac);
> +
>
...
> +
> + for_each_hw_queue(hba, i) {
> + hwq = &hba->uhq[i];
> + hwq->id = i;
> + qsize = hwq->max_entries * MCQ_ENTRY_SIZE_IN_DWORD -
> 1;
qsize is hba->nutrs, 32*8-1 = 255 =256DW, per draft spec , should not
be 8DW in 4.0?
> +
> + /* SQLBA */
> + ufsmcq_writel(hba, lower_32_bits(hwq->sqe_dma_addr),
> + MCQ_CFG_n(REG_SQLBA, i));
> + /* SQUBA */
> + ufsmcq_writel(hba, upper_32_bits(hwq->sqe_dma_addr),
> + MCQ_CFG_n(REG_SQUBA, i));
> + /* SQDAO */
> + ufsmcq_writel(hba, MCQ_ROP_OFFSET_n(ROP_SQD, i),
> + MCQ_CFG_n(REG_SQDAO, i));
>
...
> }
> +
> +out:
> + hba->mcq_base = res->base;
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_err:
> + ufshcd_mcq_release_resource(hba);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int ufshcd_mcq_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> + struct Scsi_Host *host = hba->host;
> + struct ufs_hw_queue *hwq;
> + int i, ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!is_mcq_supported(hba))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = ufshcd_mcq_config_resource(hba);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to config MCQ resource\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ufshcd_vops_config_mcq_rop(hba);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(hba->dev, "MCQ Runtime Operation Pointers not
> configured\n");
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> +
> + hba->nr_queues[HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT] = num_possible_cpus();
4.0 supports maximum number of queues is 32. for cpus < 32, cpu to
queue will be 1x1, how about cpus > 32?
> + hba->nr_queues[HCTX_TYPE_READ] = 0;
> + hba->nr_queues[HCTX_TYPE_POLL] = 1;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < HCTX_MAX_TYPES; i++)
> + host->nr_hw_queues += hba->nr_queues[i];
> +
> + host->can_queue = hba->nutrs;
Also here, can_queue is inlined with ufshci limitation, not the UFS
device limit.
> + host->cmd_per_lun = hba->nutrs;
> +
> + /* One more reserved for dev_cmd_queue */
> + hba->nr_hw_queues = host->nr_hw_queues + 1;
> +
> + hba->uhq = devm_kmalloc(hba->dev,
...
>
> ufshcd_tune_unipro_params(hba);
> @@ -9641,6 +9775,10 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void
> __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> goto out_disable;
> }
>
> + err = ufshcd_mcq_init(hba);
The driver will force the customer to use MCQ, how about adding a
configuration option for the customer to choose (like eMMC CMDQ does)?
Kind regards,
Bean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists