| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202207240839.YeZ8uQ0T-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 08:43:18 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
<zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>, tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com,
p.yadav@...com, michael@...le.cc, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, broonie@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
aidanmacdonald.0x0@...il.com, tmn505@...il.com,
paul@...pouillou.net, dongsheng.qiu@...enic.com,
aric.pzqi@...enic.com, rick.tyliu@...enic.com,
jinghui.liu@...enic.com, sernia.zhou@...mail.com,
reimu@...omaker.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] SPI: Ingenic: Add SFC support for Ingenic SoCs.
Hi "周琰杰,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on broonie-spi/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on mtd/spi-nor/next linus/master v5.19-rc7 next-20220722]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Zhou-Yanjie/Add-SFC-support-for-Ingenic-SoCs/20220723-005011
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220724/202207240839.YeZ8uQ0T-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/0d9d0e60238025a04d428e64e18211c037229284
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Zhou-Yanjie/Add-SFC-support-for-Ingenic-SoCs/20220723-005011
git checkout 0d9d0e60238025a04d428e64e18211c037229284
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=alpha SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/spi/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/spi/spi-ingenic-sfc.c: In function 'ingenic_sfc_exec_op_pio':
>> drivers/spi/spi-ingenic-sfc.c:299:16: warning: conversion from 'long unsigned int' to 'u32' {aka 'unsigned int'} changes value from '18446744073709551595' to '4294967275' [-Woverflow]
299 | writel(~(INTC_MASK_END | INTC_MASK_RREQ), sfc->base + SFC_REG_INTC);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/spi/spi-ingenic-sfc.c: In function 'ingenic_sfc_exec_op_dma':
drivers/spi/spi-ingenic-sfc.c:356:16: warning: conversion from 'long unsigned int' to 'u32' {aka 'unsigned int'} changes value from '18446744073709551599' to '4294967279' [-Woverflow]
356 | writel(~INTC_MASK_END, sfc->base + SFC_REG_INTC);
drivers/spi/spi-ingenic-sfc.c: In function 'ingenic_sfc_poll_status':
drivers/spi/spi-ingenic-sfc.c:469:16: warning: conversion from 'long unsigned int' to 'u32' {aka 'unsigned int'} changes value from '18446744073709551599' to '4294967279' [-Woverflow]
469 | writel(~INTC_MASK_END, sfc->base + SFC_REG_INTC);
vim +299 drivers/spi/spi-ingenic-sfc.c
267
268 static int ingenic_sfc_exec_op_pio(struct ingenic_sfc *sfc, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
269 {
270 int ret, val;
271
272 val = readl(sfc->base + SFC_REG_GLB);
273 u32p_replace_bits(&val, GLB_TRAN_DIR_READ, GLB_TRAN_DIR_MASK);
274 u32p_replace_bits(&val, GLB_OP_MODE_SLAVE, GLB_OP_MODE_MASK);
275 writel(val, sfc->base + SFC_REG_GLB);
276
277 val = TRAN_CONF_CMD_EN | op->cmd.opcode;
278
279 if (op->addr.nbytes > 0) {
280 val |= FIELD_PREP(TRAN_CONF_ADDR_WIDTH_MASK, op->addr.nbytes);
281
282 writel(op->addr.val & 0xffffffff, sfc->base + SFC_REG_DEV_ADDR(0));
283 writel(op->addr.val >> 32, sfc->base + SFC_REG_DEV_ADDR_PLUS(0));
284 }
285
286 if (op->dummy.nbytes > 0)
287 val |= FIELD_PREP(TRAN_CONF_DMY_BITS_MASK,
288 op->dummy.nbytes * 8 / op->dummy.buswidth);
289
290 if (op->data.nbytes > 0)
291 val |= TRAN_CONF_DATA_EN;
292
293 writel(val, sfc->base + SFC_REG_TRAN_CONF(0));
294 writel(op->data.nbytes, sfc->base + SFC_REG_TRAN_LEN);
295
296 ingenic_sfc_set_transfer_mode(sfc, op);
297
298 writel(0x1f, sfc->base + SFC_REG_SCR);
> 299 writel(~(INTC_MASK_END | INTC_MASK_RREQ), sfc->base + SFC_REG_INTC);
300
301 writel(0, sfc->base + SFC_REG_MEM_ADDR);
302
303 writel(TRIG_FLUSH, sfc->base + SFC_REG_TRIG);
304 writel(TRIG_START, sfc->base + SFC_REG_TRIG);
305
306 ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sfc->completion,
307 msecs_to_jiffies(INGENIC_SFC_TRANSFER_TIMEOUT));
308 if (!ret) {
309 writel(0x1f, sfc->base + SFC_REG_INTC);
310 writel(0x1f, sfc->base + SFC_REG_SCR);
311 dev_err(sfc->dev, "line:%d Timeout for ACK from SFC device\n", __LINE__);
312 return -ETIMEDOUT;
313 }
314
315 ingenic_sfc_read_rxfifo(sfc, op->data.buf.in, op->data.nbytes);
316 readl_poll_timeout(sfc->base + SFC_REG_SR, val, val & SR_END, 10, 0);
317
318 writel(INTC_MASK_END | INTC_MASK_RREQ, sfc->base + SFC_REG_SCR);
319 writel(TRIG_STOP, sfc->base + SFC_REG_TRIG);
320
321 return 0;
322 }
323
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists