linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/148] 5.10.133-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 24 Jul 2022 04:49:35 +0000
From:   Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@...tbaum.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/148] 5.10.133-rc1 review

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 11:53:32AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.133 release.
> There are 148 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:50:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi Greg,

5.10.133-rc1 tested.

Run tested on:
- Intel Skylake x86_64 (nuc6 i5-6260U)

In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro

Logs from: Intel Skylake x86_64 (nuc6 i5-6260U) 
nuc6:~ # dmesg
[    0.000000] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0xe2, date = 2020-07-14
[    0.000000] Linux version 5.10.133-rc1 (docker@...e7cb4c0f4) (x86_64-libreelec-linux-gnu-gcc-10.2.0 (GCC) 10.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.35.1) #1 SMP Sat Jul 23 11:54:48 UTC 2022
[    0.000000] DMI:  /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0073.2020.0909.1625 09/09/2020
...
[    0.243172] Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 64, 2MB 8, 4MB 8
[    0.243178] Spectre V1 : Mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
[    0.243181] Spectre V2 : Mitigation: IBRS
[    0.243182] Spectre V2 : Spectre v2 / SpectreRSB mitigation: Filling RSB on context switch
[    0.243183] RETBleed: Mitigation: IBRS
[    0.243186] Spectre V2 : mitigation: Enabling conditional Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier
[    0.243188] Speculative Store Bypass: Mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl and seccomp
[    0.243196] MDS: Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers
[    0.243197] MMIO Stale Data: Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers
[    0.243201] SRBDS: Mitigation: Microcode
...
[    0.313120] MDS CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible. See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/hw-vuln/mds.html for more details.
[    0.313120] MMIO Stale Data CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible. See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.html for more details.

nuc6:~ # lscpu | grep -e Vulnerability -e "Model name"
Model name:                      Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz
Vulnerability Itlb multihit:     Processor vulnerable
Vulnerability L1tf:              Mitigation; PTE Inversion
Vulnerability Mds:               Mitigation; Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable
Vulnerability Meltdown:          Mitigation; PTI
Vulnerability Mmio stale data:   Mitigation; Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable
Vulnerability Retbleed:          Mitigation; IBRS
Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Mitigation; Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl and seccomp
Vulnerability Spectre v1:        Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
Vulnerability Spectre v2:        Mitigation; IBRS, IBPB conditional, RSB filling
Vulnerability Srbds:             Mitigation; Microcode
Vulnerability Tsx async abort:   Not affected

Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@...tbaum.com>
--
Rudi