[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1822ee2c605.4a717678627753.351372059135065111@siddh.me>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 11:56:30 +0530
From: Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
To: "Hillf Danton" <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc: "David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"syzbot+c70d87ac1d001f29a058"
<syzbot+c70d87ac1d001f29a058@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
"linux-security-modules" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel-mentees"
<linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/watch_queue: Make pipe NULL while clearing
watch_queue
On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 10:54:26 +0530 Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com> wrote:
> According to sysbot's report [1], what is proposed fails to fix the
> reported uaf in the scenario below because of no wqueue->lock acquired
> in the post path. Despite of defunct checked, it is checked after taking
> pipe's wait lock - a bit too late.
>
> Hillf
>
> post_one_notification watch_queue_clear
> === ===
> pipe = wqueue->pipe;
> if (!pipe)
> return false;
> spin_lock_bh(&wqueue->lock);
> wqueue->pipe = NULL;
> spin_lock_bh(&wqueue->lock);
>
> pipe is freed
>
> spin_lock_irq(&pipe->rd_wait.lock); // uaf reported
>
> if (wqueue->defunct)
> goto out;
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000aa07b205daba6d49@google.com/
>
Before post_one_notification(), in __post_watch_notification(), on line 228
wqueue->lock is acquired (using lock_wqueue()).
The comment on post_one_notification() also tells that it should be called
with wqueue->lock held. So we do acquire the lock in the post path.
The pipe is freed after the execution of watch_queue_clear() in
free_pipe_info().
A side note: Your emails don't seem to pop up on lore's LKML archive. Maybe
check if the email isn't being blocked?
Thanks,
Siddh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists