linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kvm: fix repeated words in comments Delete the redundant word 'that'.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2207250913290.2424@hadrien>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:14:39 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
cc:     wangjianli <wangjianli@...rlc.com>, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
        paulus@...ba.org, Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr, liubo03@...pur.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kvm: fix repeated words in comments Delete the
 redundant word 'that'.



On Mon, 25 Jul 2022, Michael Ellerman wrote:

> wangjianli <wangjianli@...rlc.com> writes:
> > Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@...rlc.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> > index 514fd45c1994..73c6db20cd8a 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> > @@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_resize_hpt_commit(struct kvm *kvm,
> >   * is valid, it is written to the HPT as if an H_ENTER with the
> >   * exact flag set was done.  When the invalid count is non-zero
> >   * in the header written to the stream, the kernel will make
> > - * sure that that many HPTEs are invalid, and invalidate them
> > + * sure that many HPTEs are invalid, and invalidate them
> >   * if not.
>
> The existing wording is correct:
>
>  "the kernel will make sure that ... that many HPTEs are invalid"

Maybe it would be better as "that the number of invalid HPTEs is the same
as the invalid count"?

julia