linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] devlink: introduce framework for selftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yt5L8TbzTwthnrl7@nanopsycho>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:53:21 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com>, jiri@...dia.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        ast@...nel.org, leon@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        corbet@....net, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
        andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] devlink: introduce framework for
 selftests

Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 06:16:00PM CEST, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:52:05 +0530 Vikas Gupta wrote:
>> +enum devlink_attr_selftest_test_id {
>> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_UNSPEC,
>> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_FLASH,	/* flag */
>> +
>> +	__DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_MAX,
>> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_MAX = __DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_MAX - 1
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum devlink_selftest_test_status {
>> +	DEVLINK_SELFTEST_TEST_STATUS_SKIP,
>> +	DEVLINK_SELFTEST_TEST_STATUS_PASS,
>> +	DEVLINK_SELFTEST_TEST_STATUS_FAIL
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum devlink_attr_selftest_result {
>> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_UNSPEC,
>> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT,			/* nested */
>> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_TEST_ID,		/* u32,
>> +							 * enum devlink_attr_selftest_test_id
>> +							 */
>> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_TEST_STATUS,	/* u8,
>> +							 * enum devlink_selftest_test_status
>> +							 */
>> +
>> +	__DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_MAX,
>> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_MAX = __DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_MAX - 1
>
>Any thoughts on running:
>
>	sed -i '/_SELFTEST/ {s/_TEST_/_/g}' $patch

Sure, why not. But please make sure you keep all other related things
(variables, cmdline opts) consistent.

Thanks!


>
>on this patch? For example DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_TEST_STATUS
>is 40 characters long, ain't nobody typing that, and _TEST is repeated..
>
>Otherwise LGTM!