[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABtFH5+LvvcVscRotyRYXhXs1pPkCahbVe0NcSFxC4k_WMMsuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 17:06:20 +0800
From: ChiaEn Wu <peterwu.pub@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>,
Alice Chen <alice_chen@...htek.com>,
cy_huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
szuni chen <szunichen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/13] mfd: mt6370: Add MediaTek MT6370 support
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:43 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > +#define MT6370_REG_DEV_INFO 0x100
> > > > +#define MT6370_REG_CHG_IRQ1 0x1C0
> > > > +#define MT6370_REG_CHG_MASK1 0x1E0
> > > > +
> > > > +#define MT6370_VENID_MASK GENMASK(7, 4)
> > > > +
> > > > +#define MT6370_NUM_IRQREGS 16
> > > > +#define MT6370_USBC_I2CADDR 0x4E
> > >
> > > > +#define MT6370_REG_ADDRLEN 2
> > > > +#define MT6370_REG_MAXADDR 0x1FF
> > >
> > > These two more logically to have near to other _REG_* definitions above.
> >
...
>
> You lost me. Namespace has a meaning, i.e. grouping items of a kind.
> In your proposal I don't see that. If REG_MAXADDR and REG_ADDRLEN are
> _not_ of the _REG_ kind as per above, why do they have this namespace
> in the first place?
oh... Sorry, I just got the wrong meaning
maybe it should be revised like this, right??
-------------------------------------------------------------------
#define MT6370_REG_DEV_INFO 0x100
#define MT6370_REG_CHG_IRQ1 0x1C0
#define MT6370_REG_CHG_MASK1 0x1E0
#define MT6370_REG_MAXADDR 0x1FF // Move it to here
#define MT6370_VENID_MASK GENMASK(7, 4)
#define MT6370_NUM_IRQREGS 16
#define MT6370_USBC_I2CADDR 0x4E
#define MT6370_MAX_ADDRLEN 2 // Rename
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
ChiaEn Wu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists