| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <dccc2863-a9db-d9ea-01e1-a18cf0db1d1e@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 11:55:27 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Fabien Parent <parent.f@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>,
Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] soc: mediatek: Add support of WAY_EN operations
Il 25/07/22 10:18, Markus Schneider-Pargmann ha scritto:
> From: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>
>
> This updates the power domain to support WAY_EN operations. These
> operations enable a path between different units of the chip and are
> labeled as 'way_en' in the register descriptions.
>
> This operation is required by the mt8365 for the MM power domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Changes in v2:
> - some minor style fixes.
> - Renamed 'wayen' to 'way_en' to clarify the meaning
> - Updated commit message
>
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h | 28 +++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> index 5ced254b082b..d0eae2227813 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct scpsys_domain {
> struct clk_bulk_data *subsys_clks;
> struct regmap *infracfg;
> struct regmap *smi;
> + struct regmap *infracfg_nao;
What does "nao" mean?
Besides, please move that before *infracfg to at least keep the same type members
alphabetically sorted..
> struct regulator *supply;
> };
>
> @@ -116,23 +117,38 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
> MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> }
>
> -static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd, struct regmap *regmap)
> +static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> + struct regmap *regmap, struct regmap *infracfg_nao)
> {
> int i, ret;
>
> for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
> - u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
> + u32 mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
> + u32 val = mask, sta_mask = mask;
You have modified the macros to use sta_mask as mask, so, why are you doing
that distinction in here between the two? You can simply keep assigning
u32 mask = bpd[1].bus_prot_mask;
u32 sta_mask = bpd[1].bus_prot_sta_mask;
> + struct regmap *ack_regmap = regmap;
Double assignment. You're reassigning this if way_en == true.
>
> if (!mask)
> break;
>
> + if (bpd[i].way_en) {
> + if (!infracfg_nao)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + val = 0;
> + sta_mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_sta_mask;
> + ack_regmap = infracfg_nao;
> + }
if (bpd[i].way_en) {
ack_regmap = regmap_nao;
val = 0;
} else {
ack_regmap = regmap;
val = mask;
}
> +
> if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
> - regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
> + regmap_update_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask, val);
> else
> regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
>
> - ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
> - val, (val & mask) == mask,
> + if (bpd[i].ignore_clr_ack)
> + continue;
You're adding that ignore_clr_ack here in the bus prot enablement function
which wasn't here before... and I didn't check carefully, but I think that
this is wrong: as the name says, it's to "ignore CLEAR ack", we're not doing
any clearing here, we're not in bus_protect_disable.
If you're really sure that this is not a mistake, you should guard it for way_en.
> +
> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(ack_regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
> + val, (val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
> MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -145,34 +161,49 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_infracfg, pd->infracfg);
> + ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_infracfg,
> + pd->infracfg, pd->infracfg_nao);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - return _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi);
> + return _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi, NULL);
> }
>
> +#define mask_cond(way_en, val, mask) \
> + ((way_en && ((val & mask) == mask)) || (!way_en && !(val & mask)))
> +
> static int _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> - struct regmap *regmap)
> + struct regmap *regmap, struct regmap *infracfg_nao)
> {
> int i, ret;
>
> for (i = SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> - u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
> + u32 val = 0, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
> + u32 sta_mask = mask;
> + struct regmap *ack_regmap = regmap;
>
> if (!mask)
> continue;
>
> + if (bpd[i].way_en) {
> + if (!infracfg_nao)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + val = mask;
> + sta_mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_sta_mask;
> + ack_regmap = infracfg_nao;
> + }
> +
> if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
> - regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
> + regmap_update_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask, val);
> else
> regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
>
> if (bpd[i].ignore_clr_ack)
> continue;
>
> - ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
> - val, !(val & mask),
> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(ack_regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
> + val, mask_cond(bpd[i].way_en, val, sta_mask),
"I don't know why", my brain still keeps telling me that using different functions
for the WAY_EN (en/dis) is just better.
This commit seems to be overcomplicating two "easy" en/dis functions.
> MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -185,11 +216,12 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi);
> + ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi, NULL);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - return _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_infracfg, pd->infracfg);
> + return _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_infracfg,
> + pd->infracfg, pd->infracfg_nao);
> }
>
> static int scpsys_regulator_enable(struct regulator *supply)
> @@ -363,6 +395,10 @@ generic_pm_domain *scpsys_add_one_domain(struct scpsys *scpsys, struct device_no
> return ERR_CAST(pd->smi);
> }
>
> + pd->infracfg_nao = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional(node, "mediatek,infracfg_nao");
> + if (IS_ERR(pd->infracfg_nao))
> + return ERR_CAST(pd->infracfg_nao);
> +
I think that we should enforce a check here:
pd->infracfg_nao = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(node, "mediatek,infracfg_nao");
if (IS_ERR(pd->infracfg_nao)) {
/* checking if infracfg_nao != NULL at every pwoeron/poweroff is largely
* suboptimal, as if it't present once, it's present always (!)
*/
if (we have WAY_EN)
return ERR_CAST ...
pd->infracfg_nao = NULL;
}
> num_clks = of_clk_get_parent_count(node);
> if (num_clks > 0) {
> /* Calculate number of subsys_clks */
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> index daa24e890dd4..e788d6bdde9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> @@ -39,23 +39,29 @@
>
> #define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA 6
>
> -#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore) { \
> - .bus_prot_mask = (_mask), \
> - .bus_prot_set = _set, \
> - .bus_prot_clr = _clr, \
> - .bus_prot_sta = _sta, \
> - .bus_prot_reg_update = _update, \
> - .ignore_clr_ack = _ignore, \
> +#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore, _way_en) { \
> + .bus_prot_mask = (_mask), \
> + .bus_prot_set = _set, \
> + .bus_prot_clr = _clr, \
> + .bus_prot_sta = _sta, \
> + .bus_prot_sta_mask = _sta_mask, \
> + .bus_prot_reg_update = _update, \
> + .ignore_clr_ack = _ignore, \
> + .way_en = _way_en, \
> }
>
> #define BUS_PROT_WR(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> - _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, false)
> + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, false, false)
>
> #define BUS_PROT_WR_IGN(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> - _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, true)
> + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, true, false)
>
> #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> - _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true, false)
> + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true, false, false)
> +
> +#define BUS_PROT_WAY_EN(_en_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _sta) \
> + _BUS_PROT(_en_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _set, _sta, true, false, \
> + true)
>
> #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask) \
> BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, \
> @@ -68,8 +74,10 @@ struct scpsys_bus_prot_data {
> u32 bus_prot_set;
> u32 bus_prot_clr;
> u32 bus_prot_sta;
> + u32 bus_prot_sta_mask;
> bool bus_prot_reg_update;
> bool ignore_clr_ack;
> + bool way_en;
> };
>
> /**
Powered by blists - more mailing lists