linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] spi: a3700: support BE for AC5 SPI driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:55:05 +0300
From:   Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>, Noam <lnoam@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] spi: a3700: support BE for AC5 SPI driver

Hi Mark,

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 08:28:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 01:22:37PM +0300, Vadym Kochan wrote:
> > From: Noam <lnoam@...vell.com>
> > 
> > Tested-by: Raz Adashi <raza@...vell.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Raz Adashi <raza@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
> > ---
> 
> There's no signoff here from Noam or anyone else at Marvell...
> 

Will fix it.

> You've not copied me on the rest of the series so I've no idea what's
> going on with dependencies.  When sending a patch series it is important
> to ensure that all the various maintainers understand what the
> relationship between the patches as the expecation is that there will be
> interdependencies.  Either copy everyone on the whole series or at least
> copy them on the cover letter and explain what's going on.  If there are
> no strong interdependencies then it's generally simplest to just send
> the patches separately to avoid any possible confusion.

Sorry, I picked it from locally generated series, I will send it as
a separate patch because there are no dependencies on other patches.

Thanks!