[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABKxMyNj7Oo3X47APa8Ro-CCK3=XFogorJ2maTCstgsrrC28kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 21:30:41 +0800
From: 黄杰 <huangjie.albert@...edance.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 1/4] kexec: reuse crash kernel reserved
memory for normal kexec
Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> 于2022年7月25日周一 20:02写道:
>
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 04:38:53PM +0800, Albert Huang wrote:
> > The kexec userspace tool also needs to add parameter options(-r) that
> > support the use of reserved memory (see another patch for kexec)
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > - if (kexec_on_panic) {
> > + if (kexec_on_panic && kexec_on_reserved) {
>
> Two small questions related to this:
>
> - Why does kexec-tools need an option, or more specifically, why does
> userspace need to communicate about this at all? Can't the kernel just
> automatically use the available reserved memory in the case that's not
> already being used by the panic handler kernel? I'm curious about
> whether there are caveats that would make this occasionally
> undesirable, hence suggesting an option.
Because the crash kernel will also use this part of the memory,
so do not use this mechanism unless explicitly specified. So I tend to
add an option
>
> - I don't totally understand how this works, so I might be a bit off
> here, but is there any chance that this could be made to co-exist with
> kexec_on_panic? Can a larger region just be reserved, specifically for
> this, rather than piggy backing on the panic handler region?
>
> > +static struct page *kimage_alloc_reserverd_control_pages(struct kimage *image,
> > + case KEXEC_TYPE_RESERVED_MEM:
> > + pages = kimage_alloc_reserverd_control_pages(image, order);
>
> Nit:
> reserverd -> reserved
thanks for that, I will correct it
>
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists