linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] tracing/user_events: Use bits vs bytes for enabled status page data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220726180115.69320865@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 18:01:15 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] tracing/user_events: Use bits vs bytes for
 enabled status page data

On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:46:30 -0700
Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:

> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> index 2bcae7abfa81..4afc41e321ac 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> @@ -40,17 +40,26 @@
>   */
>  #define MAX_PAGE_ORDER 0
>  #define MAX_PAGES (1 << MAX_PAGE_ORDER)
> -#define MAX_EVENTS (MAX_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE)
> +#define MAX_BYTES (MAX_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE)
> +#define MAX_EVENTS (MAX_BYTES * 8)
>  
>  /* Limit how long of an event name plus args within the subsystem. */
>  #define MAX_EVENT_DESC 512
>  #define EVENT_NAME(user_event) ((user_event)->tracepoint.name)
>  #define MAX_FIELD_ARRAY_SIZE 1024
>  
> +#define STATUS_BYTE(bit) ((bit) >> 3)
> +#define STATUS_MASK(bit) (1 << ((bit) & 7))
> +
> +/* Internal bits to keep track of connected probes */
> +#define EVENT_STATUS_FTRACE (1 << 0)
> +#define EVENT_STATUS_PERF (1 << 1)
> +#define EVENT_STATUS_OTHER (1 << 7)

Did you mean to shift STATUS_OTHER by 7?

Is EVENT_STATUS_OTHER suppose to be one of the flags within the 3 bits of
the 7 in STATUS_MASK?

-- Steve

> +
>  static char *register_page_data;
>  
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(reg_mutex);
> -static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(register_table, 4);
> +static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(register_table, 8);
>  static DECLARE_BITMAP(page_bitmap, MAX_EVENTS);
>  
>  /*
> @@ -72,6 +81,7 @@ struct user_event {
>  	int index;
>  	int flags;
>  	int min_size;
> +	char status;
>  };