[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220726234203.GE1379820@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:42:03 -0700
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
To: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 046/102] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Support TDX private mapping
for TDP MMU
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 10:36:57AM +0800,
Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> > index 62ae590d4e5b..e5b73638bd83 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> > @@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ static int FNAME(page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault
> >
> > out_unlock:
> > write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > - kvm_release_pfn_clean(fault->pfn);
> > + kvm_mmu_release_fault(vcpu->kvm, fault, r);
>
> Do we really need this? Shadow page table is not supported for TD guest.
For consistency. pair of kvm_faultin_pfn() and kvm_mmu_release_fault().
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists