[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a395f64-8ec7-e07f-e763-afc1f2611c75@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:54:16 +0800
From: tianxianting <xianting.tian@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, anup@...infault.org,
heiko@...ech.de, guoren@...nel.org, mick@....forth.gr,
alexandre.ghiti@...onical.com, bhe@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
dyoung@...hat.com, corbet@....net
Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
crash-utility@...hat.com, huanyi.xj@...baba-inc.com,
heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com, k-hagio-ab@....com,
hschauhan@...ltrace.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V2 0/5] Fixups to work with crash tool
在 2022/7/26 上午1:13, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com 写道:
> On 25/07/2022 02:45, Xianting Tian wrote:
>> [RESEND PATCH V2 0/5] Fixups to work with crash tool
> FWIW, this is not a "resend" - there's at least a commit message
> difference here so this should have been v3. Also your cover letter
> was not the one generated for the patches you actually sent since
> it still mentions "riscv64" in the subject line for patch 5.
Sorry for this, my modification this time is still not thorough enough,
"riscv64" still exist :(
I will use V4 for next fix.
>
> That said, this does not apply to riscv/for-next:
> b4 shazam 20220725014539.1037627-1-xianting.tian@...ux.alibaba.com
> Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20220725014539.1037627-1-xianting.tian%40linux.alibaba.com/t.mbox.gz
> Checking for newer revisions on https://lore.kernel.org/all/
> Analyzing 6 messages in the thread
> Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
> ---
> [PATCH v2 1/5] RISC-V: use __smp_processor_id() instead of smp_processor_id()
> [PATCH v2 2/5] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
> [PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump
> [PATCH v2 4/5] RISC-V: Fixup getting correct current pc
> [PATCH v2 5/5] riscv: crash_core: Export kernel vm layout, phys_ram_base
> ---
> Total patches: 5
> ---
> Applying: RISC-V: use __smp_processor_id() instead of smp_processor_id()
> Applying: RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
> Patch failed at 0002 RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
patch 2 apply is OK for me, I don't know why you failed :( Do you have
more detals for this?
> When you fix that, could you also pick either "riscv" or "RISC-V" as a
> prefix the series?
thanks for the comments, I will fix it in V4.
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> I ever sent the patch 1 in the link:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220708073150.352830-3-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com/
>> And patch 2,3 in the link:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220714113300.367854-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com/
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220714113300.367854-3-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com/
>>
>> This patch series just put these patches together, and with two new patch 4, 5.
>> these five patches are the fixups for machine_kexec, kernel mode PC for vmcore
>> and improvements for vmcoreinfo and memory layout dump.
>>
>> The main changes in the five patchs as below,
>> Patch 1: use __smp_processor_id() instead of smp_processor_id() to cleanup
>> the console prints.
>> Patch 2: Add VM layout, va bits, ram base to vmcoreinfo, which can simplify
>> the development of crash tool as ARM64 already did
>> (arch/arm64/kernel/crash_core.c).
>> Patch 3: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump.
>> Patch 4: Fixup to get correct kernel mode PC for vmcore.
>> Patch 5: Updates vmcoreinfo.rst.
>>
>> With these 5 patches(patch 2 is must), crash tool can work well to analyze
>> a vmcore. The patches for crash tool for RISCV64 is in the link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220718025346.411758-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com/
>>
>> Changes v1 -> v2:
>> 1, remove the patch "Add a fast call path of crash_kexec()" from this series
>> of patches, as it already applied to riscv git.
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=3f1901110a89b0e2e13adb2ac8d1a7102879ea98
>> 2, add 'Reviewed-by' based on the comments of v1.
>>
>> Xianting Tian (5):
>> RISC-V: use __smp_processor_id() instead of smp_processor_id()
>> RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
>> riscv: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump
>> RISC-V: Fixup getting correct current pc
>> riscv64: crash_core: Export kernel vm layout, phys_ram_base
>>
>> .../admin-guide/kdump/vmcoreinfo.rst | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++
>> arch/riscv/kernel/crash_save_regs.S | 2 +-
>> arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 2 +-
>> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 4 +++
>> 6 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-riscv mailing list
>> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists