linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: gpio-74x164: add support for CDx4HC4094

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYHN3PPBb-=4MU1aTUxDvij_qeX4YkC9A28FQtUTvam0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:28:02 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: gpio-74x164: add support for CDx4HC4094

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:31 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:

> It's rather my common sense, because we have a clock here to shift a
> register. It's kinda obvious *to me* that when we have a latch, that
> latch shouldn't pass data on a level. Yes, there are buffers with
> level strobe, but it's different. So, as I said, the oscilloscope can
> finish our discussion one way or the other, but I believe it will be
> my way ;) I will very (badly) surprised if it becomes your way. It
> will ruin my beliefs in humanity. Not less.

I think you are right Andy, I trust your judgement better than my own
here for sure!

Yours,
Linus Walleij