[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5cca96f1-2f30-b0bf-394f-5ee0a29eaf3c@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:14:49 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <atishp@...shpatra.org>
CC: <will@...nel.org>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
<palmer@...belt.com>, <palmer@...osinc.com>,
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <sudeep.holla@....com>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<rafael@...nel.org>, <Daire.McNamara@...rochip.com>,
<niklas.cassel@....com>, <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
<geert@...ux-m68k.org>, <zong.li@...ive.com>, <kernel@...il.dk>,
<hahnjo@...njo.de>, <guoren@...nel.org>, <anup@...infault.org>,
<heiko@...ech.de>, <philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<maz@...nel.org>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix RISC-V's arch-topology reporting
On 26/07/2022 09:12, Atish Patra wrote:
>
> Sorry for the delayed response here. I was planning to test the series
> last week itself
> but got dragged into something else and a qemu bug for NUMA.
No worries, thanks for testing/reviewing it.
>
> Thanks for the fixes. I have tested this on Qemu(removing the topology
> node) for the following configurations.
> SMP, !SMP, NUMA (2 sockets)
A NUMA test, great! I do need to get qemu set up properly..
>
> FWIW,
> Tested-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
Thanks,
Conor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists