linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] units: complement the set of Hz units

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220726094915.grn33xjqgkm52yja@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:49:15 +0000
From:   Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@...rdevices.ru>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC:     "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" 
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
        "wsa@...nel.org" <wsa@...nel.org>,
        "lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "Michael.Hennerich@...log.com" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        "jbhayana@...gle.com" <jbhayana@...gle.com>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] units: complement the set of Hz units

Hello Andy,

Thank you for quick review.

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:29:31PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 8:44 PM Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, Hz units do not have milli, micro and nano Hz coefficients.
> > Some drivers (IIO especially) use their analogues to calculate
> > appropriate Hz values. This patch includes them to units.h definitions,
> > so they can be used from different kernel places.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +#define NHZ_PER_HZ             1000000000UL
> > +#define UHZ_PER_HZ             1000000UL
> > +#define MHZ_PER_HZ             1000UL
> 
> mHZ perhaps?
> 

I'm afraid it will not have the same view as other HZ units.
Maybe it's better to call mHZ as MILLIHZ? What do you think?

-- 
Thank you,
Dmitry