linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] RISC-V fixups to work with crash tool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <651b552d-8954-e58c-e994-4a9782f1112a@microchip.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:52:00 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <xianting.tian@...ux.alibaba.com>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        <palmer@...belt.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        <anup@...infault.org>, <heiko@...ech.de>, <guoren@...nel.org>,
        <mick@....forth.gr>, <alexandre.ghiti@...onical.com>,
        <bhe@...hat.com>, <vgoyal@...hat.com>, <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        <corbet@....net>
CC:     <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <crash-utility@...hat.com>, <huanyi.xj@...baba-inc.com>,
        <heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com>, <k-hagio-ab@....com>,
        <hschauhan@...ltrace.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] RISC-V fixups to work with crash tool

On 26/07/2022 10:37, Xianting Tian wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe

Ah I see you've already sent a v4.

> 
> Changes v1 -> v2:
>   1, remove the patch "Add a fast call path of crash_kexec()" from this series
>   of patches, as it already applied to riscv git.
>   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=3f1901110a89b0e2e13adb2ac8d1a7102879ea98
>   2, add 'Reviewed-by' based on the comments of v1.
> Changes v2 -> v3:
>   use "riscv" instead of "riscv64" in patch 5 subject line.
> Changes v3 -> v4:
>   use "riscv" instead of "riscv64" in the summary of patch 5 subject line.

There's no need to respin a series for the sake 3 characters in the cover
letter (so sorry if you misunderstood me!)...

> 
> Xianting Tian (5):
>    RISC-V: use __smp_processor_id() instead of smp_processor_id()
>    RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
>    riscv: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump
>    RISC-V: Fixup getting correct current pc
>    riscv: crash_core: Export kernel vm layout, phys_ram_base

...but it would've been good to align these to either "riscv:" or
"RISC-V:" & not mix the two in a series. Don't do this right away,
it is okay to wait for more significant changes before sending out
a new version as this sort of thing could easily be changed when
being applied.

Thanks,
Conor.