| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1fa5ebfa-b441-f42c-b721-544458b93cd0@bytedance.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 21:55:52 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: surenb@...gle.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
tj@...nel.org, corbet@....net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, songmuchun@...edance.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 9/9] sched/psi: add PSI_IRQ to track
IRQ/SOFTIRQ pressure
On 2022/7/26 02:26, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:04:39PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>> Now PSI already tracked workload pressure stall information for
>> CPU, memory and IO. Apart from these, IRQ/SOFTIRQ could have
>> obvious impact on some workload productivity, such as web service
>> workload.
>>
>> When CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING, we can get IRQ/SOFTIRQ delta time
>> from update_rq_clock_task(), in which we can record that delta
>> to CPU curr task's cgroups as PSI_IRQ_FULL status.
>>
>> Note we don't use PSI_IRQ_SOME since IRQ/SOFTIRQ always happen in
>> the current task on the CPU, make nothing productive could run
>> even if it were runnable, so we only use PSI_IRQ_FULL.
>
> That sounds reasonable.
>
>> For performance impact consideration, this is enabled by default when
>> CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING, but can be disabled by kernel cmdline
>> parameter "psi_irq=".
>
> If there isn't a concrete usecase already, let's not add another
> commandline parameter for now.
Ok, will remove it.
>
>> @@ -63,9 +64,11 @@ enum psi_states {
>> PSI_MEM_FULL,
>> PSI_CPU_SOME,
>> PSI_CPU_FULL,
>> + PSI_IRQ_SOME,
>> + PSI_IRQ_FULL,
>> /* Only per-CPU, to weigh the CPU in the global average: */
>> PSI_NONIDLE,
>> - NR_PSI_STATES = 7,
>> + NR_PSI_STATES = 9,
>> };
>
> Unfortunately, this grows the psi state touched by the scheduler into
> a second cacheline. :( Please reclaim space first.
Thank you for pointing this out!
>
> I think we can remove the NR_CPU task count, which frees up one
> u32. Something like the below diff should work (untested!)
>
> And you should be able to remove PSI_IRQ_SOME, since it's not used
> anyway. Then we'd be good to go.
Very good solution for this, I will test it later.
Thanks!
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/psi_types.h b/include/linux/psi_types.h
> index c7fe7c089718..31dc76e2d8ea 100644
> --- a/include/linux/psi_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/psi_types.h
> @@ -15,13 +15,6 @@ enum psi_task_count {
> NR_IOWAIT,
> NR_MEMSTALL,
> NR_RUNNING,
> - /*
> - * This can't have values other than 0 or 1 and could be
> - * implemented as a bit flag. But for now we still have room
> - * in the first cacheline of psi_group_cpu, and this way we
> - * don't have to special case any state tracking for it.
> - */
> - NR_ONCPU,
> /*
> * For IO and CPU stalls the presence of running/oncpu tasks
> * in the domain means a partial rather than a full stall.
> @@ -39,9 +32,11 @@ enum psi_task_count {
> #define TSK_IOWAIT (1 << NR_IOWAIT)
> #define TSK_MEMSTALL (1 << NR_MEMSTALL)
> #define TSK_RUNNING (1 << NR_RUNNING)
> -#define TSK_ONCPU (1 << NR_ONCPU)
> #define TSK_MEMSTALL_RUNNING (1 << NR_MEMSTALL_RUNNING)
>
> +/* Only one task can be scheduled, no corresponding task count */
> +#define TSK_ONCPU (1 << NR_PSI_TASK_COUNTS)
> +
> /* Resources that workloads could be stalled on */
> enum psi_res {
> PSI_IO,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
> index a4fa3aadfcba..232e1dbfad46 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void __init psi_init(void)
> group_init(&psi_system);
> }
>
> -static bool test_state(unsigned int *tasks, enum psi_states state)
> +static bool test_state(unsigned int *tasks, enum psi_states state, bool oncpu)
> {
> switch (state) {
> case PSI_IO_SOME:
> @@ -228,9 +228,9 @@ static bool test_state(unsigned int *tasks, enum psi_states state)
> return unlikely(tasks[NR_MEMSTALL] &&
> tasks[NR_RUNNING] == tasks[NR_MEMSTALL_RUNNING]);
> case PSI_CPU_SOME:
> - return unlikely(tasks[NR_RUNNING] > tasks[NR_ONCPU]);
> + return unlikely(tasks[NR_RUNNING] > oncpu);
> case PSI_CPU_FULL:
> - return unlikely(tasks[NR_RUNNING] && !tasks[NR_ONCPU]);
> + return unlikely(tasks[NR_RUNNING] && !oncpu);
> case PSI_NONIDLE:
> return tasks[NR_IOWAIT] || tasks[NR_MEMSTALL] ||
> tasks[NR_RUNNING];
> @@ -692,9 +692,9 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
> bool wake_clock)
> {
> struct psi_group_cpu *groupc;
> - u32 state_mask = 0;
> unsigned int t, m;
> enum psi_states s;
> + u32 state_mask;
>
> groupc = per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu);
>
> @@ -710,6 +710,26 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
>
> record_times(groupc, now);
>
> + /*
> + * Start with TSK_ONCPU, which doesn't have a corresponding
> + * task count - it's just a boolean flag directly encoded in
> + * the state mask. Clear, set, or carry the current state if
> + * no changes are requested.
> + */
> + if (clear & TSK_ONCPU) {
> + state_mask = 0;
> + clear &= ~TSK_ONCPU;
> + } else if (set & TSK_ONCPU) {
> + state_mask = TSK_ONCPU;
> + set &= ~TSK_ONCPU;
> + } else {
> + state_mask = groupc->state_mask & TSK_ONCPU;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The rest of the state mask is calculated based on the task
> + * counts. Update those first, then construct the mask.
> + */
> for (t = 0, m = clear; m; m &= ~(1 << t), t++) {
> if (!(m & (1 << t)))
> continue;
> @@ -729,9 +749,8 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
> if (set & (1 << t))
> groupc->tasks[t]++;
>
> - /* Calculate state mask representing active states */
> for (s = 0; s < NR_PSI_STATES; s++) {
> - if (test_state(groupc->tasks, s))
> + if (test_state(groupc->tasks, s, state_mask & TSK_ONCPU))
> state_mask |= (1 << s);
> }
>
> @@ -743,7 +762,7 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
> * task in a cgroup is in_memstall, the corresponding groupc
> * on that cpu is in PSI_MEM_FULL state.
> */
> - if (unlikely(groupc->tasks[NR_ONCPU] && cpu_curr(cpu)->in_memstall))
> + if (unlikely((state_mask & TSK_ONCPU) && cpu_curr(cpu)->in_memstall))
> state_mask |= (1 << PSI_MEM_FULL);
>
> groupc->state_mask = state_mask;
> @@ -847,7 +866,8 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
> iter = NULL;
> while ((group = iterate_groups(next, &iter))) {
> if (identical_state &&
> - per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->tasks[NR_ONCPU]) {
> + (per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->state_mask &
> + TSK_ONCPU)) {
> common = group;
> break;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists