linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] gpio: sl28cpld: Replace irqchip mask_invert with unmask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:28:26 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] gpio: sl28cpld: Replace irqchip mask_invert with unmask_base

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:13 PM Aidan MacDonald
<aidanmacdonald.0x0@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Following recent changes in regmap-irq, unmask registers can now
> describe inverted mask registers where a '1' bit enables an IRQ.
> Because this implements the same functionality as mask_invert and
> is more straightforward, the mask_invert flag has been deprecated.
>
> Update the driver by replacing all uses of mask_base & mask_invert
> with unmask_base.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> Signed-off-by: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@...il.com>
> ---
> This patch depends on the "regmap-irq cleanups and refactoring" series
> which (at time of writing) is already in linux-next.
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220623211420.918875-1-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com/
>
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c
> index 52404736ac86..2195f88c2048 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c
> @@ -70,8 +70,7 @@ static int sl28cpld_gpio_irq_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>         irq_chip->num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(sl28cpld_gpio_irqs);
>         irq_chip->num_regs = 1;
>         irq_chip->status_base = base + GPIO_REG_IP;
> -       irq_chip->mask_base = base + GPIO_REG_IE;
> -       irq_chip->mask_invert = true;
> +       irq_chip->unmask_base = base + GPIO_REG_IE;
>         irq_chip->ack_base = base + GPIO_REG_IP;
>
>         ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip_fwnode(dev, dev_fwnode(dev),
>
> base-commit: 353f7988dd8413c47718f7ca79c030b6fb62cfe5
> prerequisite-patch-id: a45db1cac7537769dc10087fc61f977dc150744c
> prerequisite-patch-id: cb8aa009c7bb7a6575eb05e3af65342dc8d0efa3
> prerequisite-patch-id: 8d32557e53b894d1fb17250d2d0eb3673f068d37
> prerequisite-patch-id: 5b293867ef81e3697892ac51b941bb53680a70dc
> prerequisite-patch-id: 8138d39a4817e804141bfe8c2ad37d9c55456a40
> prerequisite-patch-id: b01216129e887519d441cf556bbc75c397871773
> prerequisite-patch-id: b5dcf0c0609113c2d81bc557c1fc95ef23f40811
> prerequisite-patch-id: 622ca1c10e851b1889aaa567c1d2a0adf43cca44
> prerequisite-patch-id: d28c5187f9bf0e43f27b2f4aa8dcf7fd91842a03
> prerequisite-patch-id: d29d54b756be73304f844abeeaf9b46a5c0119d5
> prerequisite-patch-id: 5d405790ae89c0831b46a359f86e94bac5a67470
> prerequisite-patch-id: c90120e79acbb52ffa148bfedee1df9d35b5eced
> prerequisite-patch-id: 2e35247a5cfe5a28565c9272b85fc6835011b032
> --
> 2.35.1
>

Who took the prerequisite series? Do you mind if we wait until the
next merge window with it, that way we'll simply apply it without
having to pull in other branches?

Bart