[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220726174538.GG13489@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:45:38 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@...miny.me>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, osandov@...ndov.com,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] fscrypt: Add new encryption policy for btrfs.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:16:07PM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
> On 7/25/22 19:32, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 08:52:28PM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
> > Given that this new proposal uses per-block metadata, has
> > support for authenticated encryption been considered? Has space been reserved
> > in the per-block metadata for authentication tags so that authenticated
> > encryption support could be added later even if it's not in the initial version?
>
> I don't know sufficiently much about authenticated encryption to have
> considered it. As currently drafted, btrfs encrypts before checksumming
> if checksums are enabled, and checks against checksums before
> decrypting. Although at present we haven't discussed authentication
> tags, btrfs could store them in a separate itemtype which could be added
> at any time, much as we currently store fsverity data. We do have
> sufficient room saved for adding other encryption types, if necessary;
> we could use some of that to indicate the existence of authentication
> tags for the extents' data.
The AEAD tag can be used in place of checksum (also stored in the
checksum item).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists