linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 015/105] net: inline rollback_registered

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220727161012.679225466@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 18:10:01 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@...adcom.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 015/105] net: inline rollback_registered_many()

From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

commit 0cbe1e57a7b93517100b0eb63d8e445cfbeb630c upstream.

Similar to the change for rollback_registered() -
rollback_registered_many() was a part of unregister_netdevice_many()
minus the net_set_todo(), which is no longer needed.

Functionally this patch moves the list_empty() check back after:

	BUG_ON(dev_boot_phase);
	ASSERT_RTNL();

but I can't find any reason why that would be an issue.

Reviewed-by: Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/core/dev.c |   22 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5750,7 +5750,7 @@ static void flush_all_backlogs(void)
 	}
 
 	/* we can have in flight packet[s] on the cpus we are not flushing,
-	 * synchronize_net() in rollback_registered_many() will take care of
+	 * synchronize_net() in unregister_netdevice_many() will take care of
 	 * them
 	 */
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, &flush_cpus)
@@ -10633,8 +10633,6 @@ void synchronize_net(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_net);
 
-static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head);
-
 /**
  *	unregister_netdevice_queue - remove device from the kernel
  *	@dev: device
@@ -10658,8 +10656,7 @@ void unregister_netdevice_queue(struct n
 		LIST_HEAD(single);
 
 		list_add(&dev->unreg_list, &single);
-		rollback_registered_many(&single);
-		list_del(&single);
+		unregister_netdevice_many(&single);
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_queue);
@@ -10673,21 +10670,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_queue
  */
 void unregister_netdevice_many(struct list_head *head)
 {
-	if (!list_empty(head)) {
-		rollback_registered_many(head);
-		list_del(head);
-	}
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_many);
-
-static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head)
-{
 	struct net_device *dev, *tmp;
 	LIST_HEAD(close_head);
 
 	BUG_ON(dev_boot_phase);
 	ASSERT_RTNL();
 
+	if (list_empty(head))
+		return;
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, head, unreg_list) {
 		/* Some devices call without registering
 		 * for initialization unwind. Remove those
@@ -10771,7 +10762,10 @@ static void rollback_registered_many(str
 		dev_put(dev);
 		net_set_todo(dev);
 	}
+
+	list_del(head);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_many);
 
 /**
  *	unregister_netdev - remove device from the kernel