[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220727161015.927272635@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 18:11:21 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 095/105] x86/alternative: Report missing return thunk details
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
commit 65cdf0d623bedf0e069bb64ed52e8bb20105e2ba upstream.
Debugging missing return thunks is easier if we can see where they're
happening.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Ys66hwtFcGbYmoiZ@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -709,7 +709,9 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_ret
dest = addr + insn.length + insn.immediate.value;
if (__static_call_fixup(addr, op, dest) ||
- WARN_ON_ONCE(dest != &__x86_return_thunk))
+ WARN_ONCE(dest != &__x86_return_thunk,
+ "missing return thunk: %pS-%pS: %*ph",
+ addr, dest, 5, addr))
continue;
DPRINTK("return thunk at: %pS (%px) len: %d to: %pS",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists