[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220727163848.f4e2b263zz3vl2hc@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:38:48 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>,
Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@....com>,
upstream@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH v3 6/8] net: core: switch to
fwnode_find_net_device_by_node()
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 05:18:16PM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> Do you mean a situation analogous to what I addressed in:
> [net-next: PATCH v3 4/8] net: mvpp2: initialize port fwnode pointer
> ?
Not sure if "analogous" is the right word. My estimation is that the
overwhelmingly vast majority of DSA masters can be found by DSA simply
due to the SET_NETDEV_DEV() call that the Ethernet drivers need to make
anyway. I see that mvpp2 also needed commit c4053ef32208 ("net: mvpp2:
initialize port of_node pointer"), but that isn't needed in general, and
I can't tell you exactly why it is needed there, I don't know enough
about the mvpp2 driver.
> I found indeed a couple of drivers that may require a similar change
> (e.g. dpaa2).
There I can tell you why the dpaa2-mac code mangles with net_dev->dev.of_node,
but I'd rather not go into an explanation that essentially doesn't matter.
The point is that you'd be mistaken to think that only the drivers which
touch the net device's ->dev->of_node are the ones that need updating
for your series to not cause regressions.
> IMO we have 2 options:
> - update these drivers
> - add some kind of fallback? If yes, I am wondering about an elegant
> solution - maybe add an extra check inside
> fwnode_find_parent_dev_match?
>
> What would you suggest?
Fixing fwnode_find_parent_dev_match(), of course. This change broke DSA
on my LS1028A system (master in drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/)
and LS1021A (master in drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists