[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YuGGrltCqPo/Fk9A@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:40:46 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: mkoutny@...e.com, axboe@...nel.dk, ming.lei@...hat.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 6/8] blk-throttle: calling
throtl_dequeue/enqueue_tg in pairs
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 05:34:39PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>
> It's a litter weird to call throtl_dequeue_tg() unconditionally in
^
little
> throtl_select_dispatch(), since it will be called in
> tg_update_disptime() again if some bio is still throttled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Maybe note that this doesn't create any functional differences in the
description?
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists