[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <trinity-96b64414-7b29-4886-b309-48fc9f108959-1658953872981@3c-app-gmx-bs42>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 22:31:13 +0200
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>,
René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Subject: Aw: [RFC PATCH net-next] dt-bindings: net: dsa: mediatek,mt7530:
completely rework binding
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juli 2022 um 14:24 Uhr
> Von: "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Hi,
> To Frank:
> Let me know if MII bindings for port 5 and 6 on MT7531 are okay.
I ack krzysztof, that the change is really huge and it is hard to understand what exactly is changed and why. So please split. I have converted
it to yaml, but not have changed the logic itself. I guess you know the switch better than me.
> Does your recent patch for MT7531 make it possible to set any port for CPU,
> including user ports? For now, I put a rule to restrict CPU ports to 5 and
> 6, as described on the description of dsa port reg property.
i only know that port 5 and 6 are possible, not about the other ports. Afair there was a check if port 5 or 6 (followed by available modes
like rgmii, trgmii or sgmii) and then allow cpu-port-mode else allow only user-port mode. Had not changed this, so currently only these 2
ports can be used as CPU.
> I suppose your patch does not bring support for using MT7530's port 5 as
> CPU port. We could try this on a BPI-R2. Device schematics show that
> MT7530's GMII pins are wired to GMAC1 of MT7623NI to work as RGMII.
my patches (and the version from Vladimir that was merged) only solves the Problem that CPU-Port was fixed to 6 before. I tested Patches on r2
(mt7530) and r64 too (mt7531) that they do not break anything. But i have not disabled port 6 (maybe i had to do so for a port5-only mode), only
enabled port 5 too and run iperf3 over a vlan-aware bridge between wan-port and port 5.
> Arınç
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists