[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202207271359.61F0A0EF@keescook>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 14:00:02 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: tury <renyu@...china.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, arnd@...db.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liqiong@...china.com,
yuzhe@...china.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] lkdtm/perms: Check possible NULL pointer returned by
kmalloc(),vmalloc()
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 01:43:41PM +0800, tury wrote:
> 在 2022年07月25日 20:37, Greg KH 写道:
> > A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
> > Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
> > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> > A: Top-posting.
> > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> >
> > A: No.
> > Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
> >
> > http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 05:54:15PM +0800, tury wrote:
> > > When there is insufficient memory, the allocation will fail.
> > And have you ever seen that happen here? The issue is for small
> > allocations, they never will fail.
> >
> > > the return value is void,so i think it is ok .
> > Why?
> Because the function lkdtm_EXEC_KMALLOC() declaration is void,and The
> return value is not checked elsewhere.
> Should I add some warning messages?
Memory allocation failures will already be reported by the allocator, so
there is normally no need for an additional message.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists