[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23d40f8c-ad5b-c908-4081-24f882514ad7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:28:13 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] octeontx2-pf: Use only non-isolated cpus in irq
affinity
On 7/27/2022 6:08 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:14:02 +0530 Geetha sowjanya wrote:
>> This patch excludes the isolates cpus from the cpus list
>> while setting up TX/RX queue interrupts affinity
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
>
> Hm, housekeeping_cpumask() looks barely used by drivers,
> do you have any references to discussions indicated drivers
> are expected to pay attention to it? Really seems like something
> that the core should take care of.
>
> Tariq, thoughts?
I agree.
IMO this logic best fits inside the new sched API I proposed last week
(pending Ack...), transparent to driver.
Find here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220719162339.23865-2-tariqt@nvidia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists