[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfd44d9c-453b-e498-2630-9057947cf3cd@bytedance.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:35:56 +0800
From: 陈卓 <chenzhuo.1@...edance.com>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>, ruscur@...sell.cc,
oohall@...il.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: lukas@...ner.de, jan.kiszka@...mens.com, stuart.w.hayes@...il.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/ERR: Use pcie_aer_is_native() to judge whether OS
owns AER
On 7/26/22 9:02 PM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
>
>
> On 7/26/22 8:53 PM, Zhuo Chen wrote:
>> Use pcie_aer_is_native() in place of "host->native_aer ||
>> pcie_ports_native" to judge whether OS has native control of AER
>> in pcie_do_recovery().
>>
>> Replace "dev->aer_cap && (pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer)" in
>> get_port_device_capability() with pcie_aer_is_native(), which has no
>> functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhuo Chen <chenzhuo.1@...edance.com>
>> ---
>
> Patch looks better now. It looks like following two changes
> can also be replaced with pcie_aer_is_native() check.
>
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c:1407: if ((host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native) && aer) {
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c:1426: if ((host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native) && aer) {
Good advice. But I wonder is there a scenario that dev->rcec ("root") is
NULL meanwhile dev->aer_cap is not NULL? If so, replace
"(host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native) && aer" with
pcie_aer_is_native() will change original function.
>
>
>
>> Changelog:
>> v3:
>> - Simplify why we use pcie_aer_is_native().
>> - Revert modification of pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status() and comments.
>> v2:
>> - Add details and note in commit log.
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 3 +--
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>> index 0c5a143025af..121a53338e44 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>> @@ -184,7 +184,6 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
>> int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
>> struct pci_dev *bridge;
>> pci_ers_result_t status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER;
>> - struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
>>
>> /*
>> * If the error was detected by a Root Port, Downstream Port, RCEC,
>> @@ -243,7 +242,7 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
>> * it is responsible for clearing this status. In that case, the
>> * signaling device may not even be visible to the OS.
>> */
>> - if (host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native) {
>> + if (pcie_aer_is_native(dev)) {
>> pcie_clear_device_status(dev);
>> pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(dev);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> index 604feeb84ee4..98c18f4a01b2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> @@ -221,8 +221,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
>> - if (dev->aer_cap && pci_aer_available() &&
>> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer)) {
>> + if (pcie_aer_is_native(dev) && pci_aer_available()) {
>> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER;
>>
>> /*
>
Thanks,
Zhuo Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists