linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] hugetlbfs: fix inaccurate comment in hugetlbfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YuDfNvaNsB0pvvww@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 14:46:14 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] hugetlbfs: fix inaccurate comment in
 hugetlbfs_statfs()

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:29:18PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> In some cases, e.g. when size option is not specified, f_blocks, f_bavail
> and f_bfree will be set to -1 instead of 0. Likewise, when nr_inodes isn't
> specified, f_files and f_ffree will be set to -1 too. Update the comment
> to make this clear.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>

Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>

Thanks.