linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 11/13] leds: rgb: mt6370: Add MediaTek MT6370 current sink type LED Indicator support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABtFH5+bQx5ym5jOzCPJWbZ23WtGYYwS7cMRt2g3ipEEqTb3JA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 15:36:59 +0800
From:   ChiaEn Wu <peterwu.pub@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>,
        Alice Chen <alice_chen@...htek.com>,
        cy_huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        szuni chen <szunichen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/13] leds: rgb: mt6370: Add MediaTek MT6370 current
 sink type LED Indicator support

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:18 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:

...

> > Just for saving memory space.
> > Because these led_classdevs do not be used at the same time.
> > Or do you think it would be better to rewrite it as follows?
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > struct mt6370_led {
> >        struct led_classdev isink;
> >        struct led_classdev_mc mc;
> >        struct mt6370_priv *priv;
> >        u32 default_state;
> >        u32 index;
> > };
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You obviously didn't get what I'm talking about...
> Each union to work properly should have an associated variable that
> holds the information of which field of the union is in use. Do you
> have such a variable? If not, how does your code know which one to
> use? If yes, add a proper comment there.
>

Ummm... from my understanding,
if the colors of these four LEDs are set to 'LED_COLOR_ID_RGB' or
'LED_COLOR_ID_MULTI' in DT,
their 'led->index' will be set to 'MT6370_VIRTUAL_MULTICOLOR' in
'mt6370_leds_probe()'.
If so, these led devices will be set as 'struct led_classdev_mc' and
use related ops functions in 'mt6370_init_led_properties()'.
Instead, they whose 'led->index' is not 'MT6370_VIRTUAL_MULTICOLOR'
will be set as 'struct led_classdev'.
So, maybe the member 'index' of the 'struct mt6370_led' is what you
describe the information of which field of the union is in use?
I will add the proper comment here to describe this thing. I'm so
sorry for misunderstanding your mean last time.
Thanks again for your review.

-- 
Best Regards,
ChiaEn Wu