[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8vx0XLVsZxr-HcQZVqWjQ3tW9ZgbOU0GTKtEf=VcDWRqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:19:18 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com
Cc: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
anup@...infault.org,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] RISC-V: Kconfig.socs: Add Renesas RZ/Five SoC kconfig option
Hi Conor,
Thank you for the review.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 7:49 PM <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
> On 26/07/2022 19:06, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > Introduce SOC_RENESAS_RZFIVE config option to enable Renesas RZ/Five
> > (R9A07G043) SoC, along side also add ARCH_RENESAS config option as most
> > of the Renesas drivers depend on this config option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> > index 69774bb362d6..91b7f38b77a8 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> > @@ -80,4 +80,18 @@ config SOC_CANAAN_K210_DTB_SOURCE
> >
> > endif # SOC_CANAAN
> >
> > +config ARCH_RENESAS
>
> Hmm, I guess since it is very late in the day for v5.20 and there
> appear to be some issues with the SOC_ symbol breaking the dts build
> anyway, this is likely to be v5.21 content anyway...
>
I was targeting this for v5.21 ;)
> ...but I would be wary of adding ARCH_ symbols from ARM archs prior
> to figuring out what we actually want symbols in Kconfig.socs to
> actually at LPC or w/e. Palmer?
>
> > + bool
> > + select GPIOLIB
> > + select PINCTRL
> > + select SOC_BUS
> > +
> > +config SOC_RENESAS_RZFIVE
>
> I would like to see this added to the default defconfig so that
> it has dtbs_check coverage by default.
>
Agreed, I will include it in the next version.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists