[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e31e0c1f-4755-704e-8428-93970877d8f5@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:09:09 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: riscv: Add DT binding documentation for
Renesas RZ/Five SoC and SMARC EVK
On 27/07/2022 12:06, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:54 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 27/07/2022 11:05, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the review.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 9:54 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 26/07/2022 20:06, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
>>>>> Document Renesas RZ/Five (R9A07G043) SoC and SMARC EVK based on this SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 000000000000..f72f8aea6a82
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
>>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>>>> +---
>>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/riscv/renesas.yaml#
>>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>>> +
>>>>> +title: Renesas RZ/Five Platform Device Tree Bindings
>>>>> +
>>>>> +maintainers:
>>>>> + - Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>>>>> + - Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +# We want to ignore this schema if the board is SMARC EVK based on ARM64 arch
>>>>> +select:
>>>>> + not:
>>>>> + properties:
>>>>> + compatible:
>>>>> + contains:
>>>>> + items:
>>>>
>>>> I think you should rather ignore the RiscV SoCs, not specific board.
>>>>
>>> You mean to ignore ARM/64 SoCs?
>>>
>>> Agreed just the below enum, should do the trick.
>>>
>>> - enum:
>>> - renesas,r9a07g043u11
>>> - renesas,r9a07g043u12
>>> - renesas,r9a07g044c1
>>> - renesas,r9a07g044c2
>>> - renesas,r9a07g044l1
>>> - renesas,r9a07g044l2
>>> - renesas,r9a07g054l1
>>> - renesas,r9a07g054l2
>>>
>>>
>>>>> + - const: renesas,smarc-evk
>>>>> + - enum:
>>>>> + - renesas,r9a07g043u11
>>>>> + - renesas,r9a07g043u12
>>>>> + - renesas,r9a07g044c1
>>>>> + - renesas,r9a07g044c2
>>>>> + - renesas,r9a07g044l1
>>>>> + - renesas,r9a07g044l2
>>>>> + - renesas,r9a07g054l1
>>>>> + - renesas,r9a07g054l2
>>>>> + - enum:
>>>>> + - renesas,r9a07g043
>>>>> + - renesas,r9a07g044
>>>>> + - renesas,r9a07g054
>>>>
>>>> Did you actually test that it works and properly matches?
>>>>
>>> Yes I have run the dtbs_check and dt_binding _check for ARM64 and
>>> RISC-V. Do you see any cases where it can fail?
>>
>>
>> Just remove the renesas,smarc-evk2 from
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043u11-smarc.dts. Do you see the
>> error? Not from this schema. The only error you will see is that no
>> matching schema was found.
>>
> I did run the dtbs_check test as per your suggestion (below is the
> log) and didn't see "no matching schema error"
>
So you do not see any errors at all. Then it does not work, does it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists