linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] powerpc rng cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YuEnFgFoauUlS9kj@zx2c4.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:52:54 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] powerpc rng cleanups

Hi Michael,

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 01:54:07PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 3:09 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:24:46AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >> > These are two small cleanups for -next. This v5 rebases on the latest
> >> > git master, as some whitespace was added that made v4 no longer apply.
> >> >
> >> > Jason A. Donenfeld (2):
> >> >   powerpc/powernv: rename remaining rng powernv_ functions to pnv_
> >> >   powerpc/kvm: don't crash on missing rng, and use darn
> >> >
> >> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/archrandom.h |  7 +--
> >> >  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_builtin.c  |  7 +--
> >> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/rng.c  | 66 ++++++++++-----------------
> >> >  drivers/char/hw_random/powernv-rng.c  |  2 +-
> >> >  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> I think v5 has reached a completion point. Could you queue these up in
> >> some PPC tree for 5.20?
> >
> > Just paging again. Do you think you could queue these up for 5.20?
> > This trivial series is over a month old now.
> 
> It can't claim to fix a guest-triggerable hypervisor crash and also be
> "trivial" :)

:)

> 
> But yes I plan to queue it for v5.20.

Okay great. Would be nice to see this in -next sooner rather than later.

Jason