[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4dd9afa4-ddc1-c6c9-1205-bca28a858022@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 16:20:55 +0200
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Fix build error when CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR
is not set
Le 27/07/2022 à 13:38, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
>> Sachin reported the following build error when CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR
>> is not set:
>>
>> kernel/watchdog.c:597:20: error: static declaration of 'lockup_detector_reconfigure' follows non-static declaration
>> static inline void lockup_detector_reconfigure(void)
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> In file included from kernel/watchdog.c:17:
>> ./include/linux/nmi.h:125:6: note: previous declaration of 'lockup_detector_reconfigure' was here
>> void lockup_detector_reconfigure(void);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> The definition of lockup_detector_reconfigure should be exported even in
>> that case, and __lockup_detector_reconfigure should remain static.
>>
>> Fixes: 24a1260705b7 ("watchdog: export lockup_detector_reconfigure")
>> Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/watchdog.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks.
>
> I'll squash that in to the original commit.
Thanks Michael,
I was thinking this is too late for such a squash.
Laurent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists