[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d1e2294-a3b7-972b-f021-cecee8779f1b@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 17:54:04 +0200
From: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: vt6655: Rename byOrgValue to reg_value in a
macro
On 7/27/22 08:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 06:24:32PM +0200, Philipp Hortmann wrote:
>> Fix name of a variable in a macro that uses CamelCase which is not
>> accepted by checkpatch.pl
>
> Why rename something you are about to delete in a later patch?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
I need to rename this variable. Does it matter if I do it in first or
last patch? When doing it first I do not have to review so much
checkpatch warnings.
Or is it OK to convert the macro to a function and rename the variable
in one patch?
thanks,
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists