lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d1e2294-a3b7-972b-f021-cecee8779f1b@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 17:54:04 +0200
From:   Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: vt6655: Rename byOrgValue to reg_value in a
 macro

On 7/27/22 08:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 06:24:32PM +0200, Philipp Hortmann wrote:
>> Fix name of a variable in a macro that uses CamelCase which is not
>> accepted by checkpatch.pl
> 
> Why rename something you are about to delete in a later patch?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

I need to rename this variable. Does it matter if I do it in first or 
last patch? When doing it first I do not have to review so much 
checkpatch warnings.

Or is it OK to convert the macro to a function and rename the variable 
in one patch?

thanks,

Philipp

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ