lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220727160959.806070508@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 18:10:46 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
        Lech Perczak <l.perczak@...lintechnologies.com>,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 17/26] Revert "Revert "char/random: silence a lockdep splat with printk()""

From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>

In 2019, Sergey fixed a lockdep splat with 15341b1dd409 ("char/random:
silence a lockdep splat with printk()"), but that got reverted soon
after from 4.19 because back then it apparently caused various problems.
But the issue it was fixing is still there, and more generally, many
patches turning printk() into printk_deferred() have landed since,
making me suspect it's okay to try this out again.

This should fix the following deadlock found by the kernel test robot:

[   18.287691] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[   18.287692] 4.19.248-00165-g3d1f971aa81f #1 Not tainted
[   18.287693] ------------------------------------------------------
[   18.287712] stop/202 is trying to acquire lock:
[   18.287713] (ptrval) (console_owner){..-.}, at: console_unlock (??:?)
[   18.287717]
[   18.287718] but task is already holding lock:
[   18.287718] (ptrval) (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: pty_write (pty.c:?)
[   18.287722]
[   18.287722] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[   18.287723]
[   18.287724]
[   18.287725] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[   18.287725]
[   18.287726] -> #2 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}:
[   18.287729] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[   18.287729] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[   18.287730] lock_acquire (??:?)
[   18.287731] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (??:?)
[   18.287732] tty_port_tty_get (??:?)
[   18.287733] tty_port_default_wakeup (tty_port.c:?)
[   18.287734] tty_port_tty_wakeup (??:?)
[   18.287734] uart_write_wakeup (??:?)
[   18.287735] serial8250_tx_chars (??:?)
[   18.287736] serial8250_handle_irq (??:?)
[   18.287737] serial8250_default_handle_irq (8250_port.c:?)
[   18.287738] serial8250_interrupt (8250_core.c:?)
[   18.287738] __handle_irq_event_percpu (??:?)
[   18.287739] handle_irq_event_percpu (??:?)
[   18.287740] handle_irq_event (??:?)
[   18.287741] handle_edge_irq (??:?)
[   18.287742] handle_irq (??:?)
[   18.287742] do_IRQ (??:?)
[   18.287743] common_interrupt (entry_32.o:?)
[   18.287744] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (??:?)
[   18.287745] uart_write (serial_core.c:?)
[   18.287746] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[   18.287747] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[   18.287747] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[   18.287748] __vfs_write (??:?)
[   18.287749] vfs_write (??:?)
[   18.287750] ksys_write (??:?)
[   18.287750] sys_write (??:?)
[   18.287751] do_fast_syscall_32 (??:?)
[   18.287752] entry_SYSENTER_32 (??:?)
[   18.287752]
[   18.287753] -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
[   18.287756]
[   18.287756] -> #0 (console_owner){..-.}:
[   18.287759] check_prevs_add (lockdep.c:?)
[   18.287760] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[   18.287761] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[   18.287761] lock_acquire (??:?)
[   18.287762] console_unlock (??:?)
[   18.287763] vprintk_emit (??:?)
[   18.287764] vprintk_default (??:?)
[   18.287764] vprintk_func (??:?)
[   18.287765] printk (??:?)
[   18.287766] get_random_u32 (??:?)
[   18.287767] shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[   18.287767] allocate_slab (slub.c:?)
[   18.287768] new_slab (slub.c:?)
[   18.287769] ___slab_alloc+0x6d0/0xb20
[   18.287770] __slab_alloc+0xd6/0x2e0
[   18.287770] __kmalloc (??:?)
[   18.287771] tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[   18.287772] __tty_buffer_request_room (tty_buffer.c:?)
[   18.287773] tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag (??:?)
[   18.287774] pty_write (pty.c:?)
[   18.287775] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[   18.287776] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[   18.287777] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[   18.287778] __vfs_write (??:?)
[   18.287779] vfs_write (??:?)
[   18.287780] ksys_write (??:?)
[   18.287780] sys_write (??:?)
[   18.287781] do_fast_syscall_32 (??:?)
[   18.287782] entry_SYSENTER_32 (??:?)
[   18.287783]
[   18.287783] other info that might help us debug this:
[   18.287784]
[   18.287785] Chain exists of:
[   18.287785]   console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &(&port->lock)->rlock
[   18.287789]
[   18.287790]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   18.287790]
[   18.287791]        CPU0                    CPU1
[   18.287792]        ----                    ----
[   18.287792]   lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
[   18.287794]                                lock(&port_lock_key);
[   18.287814]                                lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
[   18.287815]   lock(console_owner);
[   18.287817]
[   18.287818]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   18.287818]
[   18.287819] 6 locks held by stop/202:
[   18.287820] #0: (ptrval) (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}, at: ldsem_down_read (??:?)
[   18.287823] #1: (ptrval) (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}, at: tty_write_lock (tty_io.c:?)
[   18.287826] #2: (ptrval) (&o_tty->termios_rwsem/1){++++}, at: n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[   18.287830] #3: (ptrval) (&ldata->output_lock){+.+.}, at: process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[   18.287834] #4: (ptrval) (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: pty_write (pty.c:?)
[   18.287838] #5: (ptrval) (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning (printk.c:?)
[   18.287841]
[   18.287842] stack backtrace:
[   18.287843] CPU: 0 PID: 202 Comm: stop Not tainted 4.19.248-00165-g3d1f971aa81f #1
[   18.287843] Call Trace:
[   18.287844] dump_stack (??:?)
[   18.287845] print_circular_bug.cold+0x78/0x8b
[   18.287846] check_prev_add+0x66a/0xd20
[   18.287847] check_prevs_add (lockdep.c:?)
[   18.287848] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[   18.287848] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[   18.287849] lock_acquire (??:?)
[   18.287850] ? console_unlock (??:?)
[   18.287851] console_unlock (??:?)
[   18.287851] ? console_unlock (??:?)
[   18.287852] ? native_save_fl (??:?)
[   18.287853] vprintk_emit (??:?)
[   18.287854] vprintk_default (??:?)
[   18.287855] vprintk_func (??:?)
[   18.287855] printk (??:?)
[   18.287856] get_random_u32 (??:?)
[   18.287857] ? shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[   18.287858] shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[   18.287858] ? page_address (??:?)
[   18.287859] allocate_slab (slub.c:?)
[   18.287860] new_slab (slub.c:?)
[   18.287861] ? pvclock_clocksource_read (??:?)
[   18.287862] ___slab_alloc+0x6d0/0xb20
[   18.287862] ? kvm_sched_clock_read (kvmclock.c:?)
[   18.287863] ? __slab_alloc+0xbc/0x2e0
[   18.287864] ? native_wbinvd (paravirt.c:?)
[   18.287865] __slab_alloc+0xd6/0x2e0
[   18.287865] __kmalloc (??:?)
[   18.287866] ? __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[   18.287867] ? tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[   18.287868] tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[   18.287869] __tty_buffer_request_room (tty_buffer.c:?)
[   18.287869] tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag (??:?)
[   18.287870] pty_write (pty.c:?)
[   18.287871] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[   18.287872] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[   18.287873] ? print_dl_stats (??:?)
[   18.287874] ? n_tty_ioctl (n_tty.c:?)
[   18.287874] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[   18.287875] ? n_tty_ioctl (n_tty.c:?)
[   18.287876] ? tty_write_unlock (tty_io.c:?)
[   18.287877] __vfs_write (??:?)
[   18.287877] vfs_write (??:?)
[   18.287878] ? __fget_light (file.c:?)
[   18.287879] ksys_write (??:?)

Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc: Lech Perczak <l.perczak@...lintechnologies.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Ytz+lo4zRQYG3JUR@xsang-OptiPlex-9020
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/char/random.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -184,8 +184,8 @@ static void __cold process_random_ready_
 
 #define warn_unseeded_randomness() \
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WARN_ALL_UNSEEDED_RANDOM) && !crng_ready()) \
-		pr_notice("%s called from %pS with crng_init=%d\n", \
-			  __func__, (void *)_RET_IP_, crng_init)
+		printk_deferred(KERN_NOTICE "random: %s called from %pS with crng_init=%d\n", \
+				__func__, (void *)_RET_IP_, crng_init)
 
 
 /*********************************************************************


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ