lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6795356b-29d4-0098-f282-1eaf4fb21108@baylibre.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jul 2022 19:35:20 +0200
From:   Julien Panis <jpanis@...libre.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        jic23@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc:     lars@...afoo.de, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mranostay@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-binding: iio: time: add capture-tiecap.yaml



On 28/07/2022 15:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/07/2022 14:52, Julien Panis wrote:
>> This commit adds a YAML binding for TI ECAP used in capture operating mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Panis <jpanis@...libre.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/iio/time/capture-tiecap.yaml     | 68 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/time/capture-tiecap.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/time/capture-tiecap.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/time/capture-tiecap.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..5d66df90ba5d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/time/capture-tiecap.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/time/capture-tiecap.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> Still wrong file name.
>
> Do not ignore comments you received. Either you implement them or you
> keep the discussion going.


Sorry, that was not intentional. I have prepared a new version which 
takes into account your last comments.

Julien

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ