[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VehvE1cN9kMAhkuRrgek9Tt9OExpYnkPYNqocGPEG6Tew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 23:41:31 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Tasanakorn Phaipool <tasanakorn@...il.com>,
Sheng-Yuan Huang <syhuang3@...oton.com>,
Kuan-Wei Ho <cwho@...oton.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] leds: simatic-ipc-leds-gpio: add new model 227G
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 5:57 PM Henning Schild
<henning.schild@...mens.com> wrote:
>
> This adds support of the Siemens Simatic IPC227G. Its LEDs are connected
> to GPIO pins provided by the gpio-f7188x module. We make sure that
> gets loaded, if not enabled in the kernel config no LED support will be
> available.
...
> + switch (plat->devmode) {
> + case SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_127E:
> + simatic_ipc_led_gpio_table = &simatic_ipc_led_gpio_table_127e;
> + break;
> + case SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_227G:
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIO_F7188X))
> + return -ENODEV;
Hmm... What is the difference with the 127E model in the sense of the
driver absence? Why do we need this check?
> + request_module("gpio-f7188x");
I'm not sure why you need request_module().
> + simatic_ipc_led_gpio_table = &simatic_ipc_led_gpio_table_227g;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists