[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YuMPHCanuPtYEN4j@google.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:35:08 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Anirudh Rayabharam <anrayabh@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/25] KVM: VMX: nVMX: Support TSC scaling and
PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL with enlightened VMCS
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 7/29/22 00:13, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > The only flaw in this is if KVM gets handed a CPUID model that enumerates support
> > for 2025 (or whenever the next update comes) but not 2022. Hmm, though if Microsoft
> > defines each new "version" as a full superset, then even that theoretical bug goes
> > away. I'm happy to be optimistic for once and give this a shot. I definitely like
> > that it makes it easier to see the deltas between versions.
>
> Okay, I have queued the series but I still haven't gone through all the
> comments. So this will _not_ be in the 5.21 pull request.
I assume you meant 5.20?
> The first patch also needs a bit more thought to figure out the impact on
> userspace and whether we can consider syndbg niche enough to not care.
>
> Paolo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists