[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <032b3c3f-f899-bf53-ecbb-35191d39392b@amlogic.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 16:06:25 +0800
From: Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Add S4 SoC clock controller driver
Hi JB,
On 2022/7/28 15:08, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
>
> On Thu 28 Jul 2022 at 13:41, Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com> wrote:
>
>> 1. Add clock controller driver for S4 SOC.
>>
>> Yu Tu (3):
>> dt-bindings: clk: meson: add S4 SoC clock controller bindings
>> arm64: dts: meson: add S4 Soc clock controller in DT
>> clk: meson: s4: add s4 SoC clock controller driver
>>
>> V1 -> V2: Change format as discussed in the email.
>>
>> Link:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-amlogic/20220708062757.3662-1-yu.tu@amlogic.com/
>>
>> .../bindings/clock/amlogic,gxbb-clkc.txt | 1 +
>> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 11 +
>> drivers/clk/meson/Kconfig | 15 +
>> drivers/clk/meson/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/clk/meson/s4.c | 4732 +++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/clk/meson/s4.h | 296 ++
>> include/dt-bindings/clock/s4-clkc.h | 146 +
>> 8 files changed, 5203 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/meson/s4.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/meson/s4.h
>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/s4-clkc.h
>>
>>
>> base-commit: b293bc9286ee21824e93f0fcfed3b78fdfee01e6
>
> Please don't post until you have addressed *ALL* the comments from the
> previous version.
The last email asked you to adopt A1 method, but you did not reply?
>
> At first glance, I can see that this is still a single driver for
> what is obviously 2 controllers with 2 register spaces. Simple comments
> like the "<< 2" in the register declaration have not been addressed either.
I understand that this should be a controller, just two address
descriptions. One is the various PLL registers and one is the clock for
the peripherals. And PLL is to provide a clock source for various
peripheral clocks. So a clock controller is reasonable. I think you got
it wrong.
Ok, if you insist on using two clock controllers,, please provide your
the reason and example code?
>
> Seeing that, I have not reviewed this version further.
> I won't until all the comments from v1 are either addressed or answer
>
> Regards
> Jerome
>
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists