[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10c1e0f9-8409-a0f4-9b18-a5f56dfb14e1@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 09:02:57 +0800
From: Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] LoongArch: Support relocation against
_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
On 07/28/2022 12:28 AM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> With the stack-based relocations, the assembler emits three relocations
> to push the PC-relative offset of a GOT entry:
>
> R_LARCH_SOP_PUSH_PCREL _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
> R_LARCH_SOP_PUSH_GPREL foo
> R_LARCH_SOP_ADD
>
> "_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_" does not really exist in the symtab and the BFD
> linker handles it with special hack. Implement a similar hack for
> kernel so we will be able to really use R_LARCH_SOP_PUSH_GPREL
> relocation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
> ---
> arch/loongarch/kernel/module-sections.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/module-sections.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/module-sections.c
> index 509c0b86b1e9..73976addbf60 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/module-sections.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/module-sections.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ int module_frob_arch_sections(Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
> char *secstrings, struct module *mod)
> {
> unsigned int i, num_plts = 0, num_gots = 0;
> + Elf_Shdr *symtab = NULL;
> + Elf_Sym *symbols;
> + char *strings;
>
> /*
> * Find the empty .plt sections.
> @@ -100,6 +103,8 @@ int module_frob_arch_sections(Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
> mod->arch.plt_idx.shdr = sechdrs + i;
> else if (!strcmp(secstrings + sechdrs[i].sh_name, ".got"))
> mod->arch.got.shdr = sechdrs + i;
> + else if (sechdrs[i].sh_type == SHT_SYMTAB)
> + symtab = sechdrs + i;
> }
>
> if (!mod->arch.plt.shdr) {
> @@ -115,6 +120,22 @@ int module_frob_arch_sections(Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
> return -ENOEXEC;
> }
>
> + if (!symtab) {
> + pr_err("%s: module symbol table missing\n", mod->name);
> + return -ENOEXEC;
> + }
> +
> + symbols = (void *) ehdr + symtab->sh_offset;
> + strings = (void *) ehdr + sechdrs[symtab->sh_link].sh_offset;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < symtab->sh_size / sizeof(Elf_Sym); i++)
> + if (symbols[i].st_shndx == SHN_UNDEF &&
> + strcmp(strings + symbols[i].st_name,
> + "_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_") == 0) {
> + symbols[i].st_shndx = mod->arch.got.shdr - sechdrs;
> + symbols[i].st_value = 0;
> + }
> +
> /* Calculate the maxinum number of entries */
> for (i = 0; i < ehdr->e_shnum; i++) {
> int num_rela = sechdrs[i].sh_size / sizeof(Elf_Rela);
Hi, Ruoyao,
It is possible to create a symbol when linking, which means
maybe we can add _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ in 'module.lds.h'.
What do you think about it?
Thanks,
Jinyang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists