[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3be9062-ade9-56c7-71f3-a8cce1db0583@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 20:01:07 +0800
From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
<namhyung@...nel.org>, <pc@...ibm.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 06/17] perf kwork: Implement perf kwork report
Hello Arnaldo,
On 2022/7/27 22:04, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 08:39:33AM +0800, Yang Jihong escreveu:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 2022/7/27 1:40, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 09:50:22AM +0800, Yang Jihong escreveu:
>>>> +
>>>> +static void report_print_work(struct perf_kwork *kwork,
>>>> + struct kwork_work *work)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>> + char kwork_name[PRINT_KWORK_NAME_WIDTH];
>>>> + char max_runtime_start[32], max_runtime_end[32];
>>>
>>> Committer notes:
>>>
>>> - Add some {} for multiline for/if blocks
>>>
>>> - Return the calculated number of printed bytes in report_print_work,
>>> otherwise soem compilers will complain that variable isn't used, e.g.:
>>>
>>> 2 92.64 almalinux:9 : FAIL clang version 13.0.1 (Red Hat 13.0.1-1.el9)
>>> builtin-kwork.c:1061:6: error: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>> int ret = 0;
>>>
>>>
>> OK, I'll fix it in next version.
>
> your work with these fixups is already at acme/perf/core:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git perf/core
>
> Please continue from there. Please let me know if I made some mistake.
>
> Thanks for working on this!
>
Thanks to these fixups.
OK, I'll send fix patches according to review comments based on this branch.
Regards,
Jihong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists