linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: phy: add definition for MSM8960

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9ba45cca-79c9-d1e4-5b2c-15c73a8297b6@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:03:42 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>, Shinjo Park <peremen@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: phy: add definition for MSM8960

On 28/07/2022 13:54, David Heidelberg wrote:
> On 28/07/2022 13:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/07/2022 13:17, Shinjo Park wrote:
>>> Document the changes introduced by MSM8960 inclusion.
>>>
>> 1. Thread your submissions.
>> 2. Use subject prefix matching the file.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shinjo Park <peremen@...il.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
>> It is a v1. How the review tag got here?
> 
> We have a Matrix channel ( #linux-apq8064:matrix.org and downstream fork 
> for apq8064/msm8960 [1]), so I saw the patch before it was send to ML.
> 
> David

New submitters and beginners should rather use full-mailing list
process. Since there is quite a chance of beginner mistakes (which was
seen here), they might misunderstand something and add Reviewed-by tag
even if not received it with respective "Reviewer's statement of oversight".

Best regards,
Krzysztof