[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YuKaF99Da1vqpqVP@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:15:51 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@...eticom.com>,
David Sloan <David.Sloan@...eticom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] md/raid5: Ensure batch_last is released before
sleeping for quiesce
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 03:06:00PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> +static struct stripe_head *__raid5_get_active_stripe(struct r5conf *conf,
> + struct stripe_request_ctx *ctx, sector_t sector,
> + bool previous, bool noblock, bool noquiesce)
Passing three different bool arguments right after another is a really
confusing calling convention, at some point this should become a set of
flags. I'd also drop the __raid5_get_active_stripe vs
raid5_get_active_stripe distinction.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists