[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220728152355.GB25894@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:23:55 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroup/cpuset: Keep current cpus list if cpus
affinity was explicitly set
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:59:01AM -0400, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
> Cgroup v1 doesn't have this problem.
v1 analogy would be:
echo 2-3 >$dst/cpuset.cpus
# job runs in $dst
# one task T in $dst sets affinity just to one cpu
# I rethink my config, I want to allow $dst more space
echo 2-5 >$dst/cpuset.cpus
Most tasks in $dst happily utilize the new cpus but it breaks affinity
for T -- this must have been broken since ever.
(Or I'd argue that per-thread affinities are just recommendations, if I
have a task for nohz CPU, I should enforce its placement with cpuset
from the beginning.)
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists