linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: mt8173-oak: Switch to SMC watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEXTbpc7W40-vYcTVTNo7ikQ-n0O246AsbPntNb4q2nBErYVQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jul 2022 23:39:26 +0800
From:   Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Eizan Miyamoto <eizan@...omium.org>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
        Evan Benn <evanbenn@...omium.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: mt8173-oak: Switch to SMC watchdog

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 7:21 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 27/07/22 11:40, Pin-yen Lin ha scritto:
> > Switch to SMC watchdog because we need direct control of HW watchdog
> > registers from kernel. The corresponding firmware was uploaded in
> > https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/3405.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Move the modifications to mt8173-elm.dtsi and add some comments.
> >
> >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
> > index e21feb85d822..b2269770abc3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
> > @@ -161,6 +161,18 @@ hdmi_connector_in: endpoint {
> >                       };
> >               };
> >       };
> > +
> > +     soc {
> > +             /*
> > +              * Disable the original MMIO watch dog and switch to the SMC watchdog,
> > +              * which operates on the same MMIO.
> > +              */
> > +             /delete-node/ watchdog@...07000;
>
> Unfortunately, we're not quite there yet.
> The comment is fine, but...
>
> There's no need to /delete-node/: you can just do it like
>
> /*
>   * Disable the original MMIO watch dog and switch to the SMC watchdog,
>   * which operates on the same MMIO.
>   */
> &watchdog {
>         status = "disabled";
> };
>
> and...
>
> > +
> > +             watchdog {
>
> This isn't addressable, hence it belongs to the root node, not to soc.
> If you did that because of naming issues, I would propose to call it
> smc-watchdog instead of watchdog.
>
>
> > +                     compatible = "arm,smc-wdt";
>
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll modify it accordingly in v3.

> P.S.: No timeout-sec?

The example in the binding file has a timeout-sec property, but it is
not defined in the binding nor used in the driver...
The driver seems to talk with the firmware to get a timeout value[1]
instead of reading it from the devicetree.

[1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/watchdog/arm_smc_wdt.c#L138
>
> Regards,
> Angelo
>
> > +             };
> > +     };
> >   };
> >
> >   &mfg_async {
> >
>