linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] iio: humidity: hdc100x: switch to probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d5f6a7e0-60e7-5afe-30c7-8ba76ab12a5c@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jul 2022 08:43:24 +0800
From:   Potin Lai <potin.lai.pt@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Patrick Williams <patrick@...cx.xyz>,
        Potin Lai <potin.lai@...ntatw.com>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] iio: humidity: hdc100x: switch to probe_new
 callback

On 7/29/22 04:41, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:32 PM Potin Lai <potin.lai.pt@...il.com> wrote:
>> Switch to probe_new callback due to probe is deprecated soon.
> Just noticed that commit message is a bit not okay in a few ways:
> 1) we refer to the callbacks like ->probe_new();
> 2) we don't know when we deprecate it, the point here is not that, but
> unused id parameter in the current code.
>
>
Thanks for point it out, is it OK leave the message as it is? or you prefer to submit another version to fix it?
If new version required, I will also add another patch for struct device pointer you mentioned in the other reply.

Just want to confirm that is the new message looks OK?
New message:
Switch ->porbe() to new callback ->probe_new()

Thanks,
Potin